Queen Camilla had a “raunchy and randy” past that stopped the Royal Family from accepting her, royal author Omid Scobie claims.
In his new explosive book, Endgame, which is released today, Scobie delves deep into Royal Family feuds and crises.
His latest claim is that in her youth, Queen Camilla – known as Ms Shand then – was known for being “raunchy and randy” and would “enjoy her sexual freedoms” while throwing “her knickers on the table”.
Scobie writes: “Camilla might not have stood on the barricades in the sixties, but she did enjoy the sexual freedoms ushered in by that radical generation.
“Over the years, some who knew Camilla during this time have told various authors and journalists that the young Ms Shand was known for being ‘raunchy and randy’ and the sort to ‘throw her knickers on the table.'”
Click here to join our Whatsapp community to be the first to receive news about the Royal family
Her previous sexual freedoms, according to the author, made the Firm initially reject her as a potential wife for the then Prince of Wales.
The book reads: “This reputation is one of the reasons why Queen Elizabeth II and the Firm rejected Camilla as a spouse for Charles, alongside the fact she was a ‘commoner’ (the air around her family home was not rarified enough) and an ‘experienced woman’ (read: not a virgin).”
Charles later married the “royally approved” Princess Diana and welcomed Prince William and Prince Harry with her, whilst Camilla married Andrew Parker Bowles.
But the then-heir to the throne could not “resist” free-spirited Camilla and got into an affair with her.
According to Endgame, the two would use friend’s houses to spend time together, providing quotes from a housekeeper who claimed she would find lots of underwear around the place after they were gone.
The affair led to the infamous Camillagate phone call in which the now-King reportedly said he wanted to “live” in Camilla’s trousers.
Charles is said to have declared he wanted to “feel my way along you, all over you and up and down you and in and out,” adding: “Oh, God. I’ll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be much easier!”
