To me, this isn’t safe. I’d be worried they could fall or have an accident. During Thanksgiving, my 4-year-old niece was running on a deck near a pond by herself. My brother and his wife were still inside socializing. To child-free me, this is nuts!
Frankly, I think my brother and his wife are just lazy parents at times and let the kids do whatever they want. Should I say something? What’s your opinion of this parenting style?
Anonymous: Even fairly strict and more attentive parents tend to let their kids “free range” when they’re at family events, where there are lots of other adults and often older children around. This definitely carries risks, because parents sometimes really check out, or they assume that other adults have an eye on their children when they don’t.
Also, at family events and parties, most children go just a little haywire.
My greater point is that unless you have spent time with this family in their home, accompanying them and their children throughout a fairly normal day, then you don’t really know what kind of parents they are. Overall, I think that “free range” parenting is great — and that letting children explore and try new things on their own helps them to develop judgment, self-confidence and resilience.
So back, now, to family events and parties. If there is a deck with a loose railing, a swimming pool, a pond or creek, a busy road, skeevy neighbors or family members (or other obvious hazards), then an adult should be assigned (or assign themselves) to be in that area and loosely supervise the children.
Because you are vigilant and careful, and because you care, this might be a good job for you.
Dear Amy: My husband and I recently adopted a sweet baby boy. We started out as foster parents with parental reunification as the goal. Unfortunately, the parents were not able to satisfy the requirements of the social agencies involved, and none of his other relatives were able to adopt him.
Because of our age (in our 60s), we were doubtful the judge would grant our request to adopt our son, but we have since learned that there are grandparents and even great-grandparents adopting children. Fortunately, the judge recognized the bond we all had and allowed us to adopt this dear baby.
This was a long and very stressful process, but for the love and safety of this child, we would do it all over again.
My question is this: When we are out in public, people will inevitably ask, “Grandson?” When we say, “Parents,” people are understandably shocked. Should we just ignore the incredulous looks or say, “Adoptive parents”?
It is very important to us that this baby boy does not feel any less than our own biological child. How should we respond?
— Older, Wiser, Happier
Happier: In adopting your son, you’ve joined the growing demographic of elders raising children. Approximately 3 million American grandparents have full responsibility for raising grandchildren, according to AARP; countless other grandparents, great-grandparents and other elders provide part-time child care.
In terms of responding to people who assume you are grandparents, while your son is young, you might say: “We’re parents! The adoption came through last year.” When your son is older and aware of the question, you can simply respond brightly: “We’re not grandparents. We’re his proud parents!”
Make sure to include your son in his adoption story starting now. He’ll probably encounter this question many times, from a different angle. Even when this query is annoying, I hope you will always lead with your joy.
Dear Amy: I was truly disgusted with your reply to “Distracted Concertgoer,” who complained about crying children at a community band concert.
What has happened to parents? What would possess them to bring a baby to a concert in the first place? This is flat-out rude.
Appalled: I assume that these parents probably had another child, a parent or another family member participating. That’s what community concerts are all about!
© 2023 by Amy Dickinson. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency.
